*Subject: Comparative Literature. Course: All. Study level: Bachelor's and Master's. Class size: two students from each course.*

There is a long tradition for semester reporting meetings at Comparative Literature and they are found in other forms in degree programme committees. But we maintain the form because it goes right down to the level of each course.

- To get students and lecturers to take a look at the process from both sides and in relation to the entire degree programme
- That the students and lecturers together reflect on the evaluations and transfer the experiences from semester to semester.

At Comparative Literature's semester reporting meetings, all lecturers and representatives of all courses meet and together review the previous semester’s teaching.

Representatives for the courses as elected at the final lesson.

The meetings will take approx. three hours and the only item on the agenda is the review of around fifteen semester reports. Here, both problems and "best practice" are addressed. The tone is courteous and constructive - also if there are problems with something or other.

In general the lecturers starts with a brief comment on his or her report, before the students voice their opinion and the discussion can then begin. This is repeated again, though with a summation of how the semester has been across the year group.

The meetings are one of the cornerstones of the subject's evaluation culture and they give a high degree of joint ownership of the degree programme, where both student and lecturers are bound by something that is larger than the isolated course of study.

Reflection on the subject is also enhanced among the lecturers who have the opportunity to discuss what has worked well and poorly during the past course of study. At the same time the meetings are important as preparation for adjustments and changes to academic regulations, where you have received a detailed review of the degree programme's disciplines, and in particular for the students' perspective on the academic context.

Different academic environments require different ways of passing on their experiences. But the creation of a discussion space that contains both students and lecturers across a degree programme with a strong focus on the individual courses, provides a solid basis for an exchange of experiences and the creation of mutual respect between all parties.

- THEME: Lectures
- THEME: Teaching and digital media
- THEME: Exam
- THEME: Teaching evaluation
- THEME: Feedback
- THEME: Student teachers
- THEME: Internationalisation
- THEME: Activities between sessions
- THEME: Questions in sessions
- THEME: Teaching strategies of studying
- THEME: Entrepreneurship
- THEME: Supervision
- Tool: Exam: Assessment form
- Tool: Exam: Memory game for revision
- Tool: Idea Generation: Brainwalk
- Example of practice: Academic skills development
- Example of practice: Academic speed dating
- Example of practice: Academic quiz
- Example of practice: Academic weekend
- Example of practice: Analysis introduction
- Example of practice: Asking questions
- Example of practice: Balancing your expectations
- Example of practice: Brainwalk
- Example: Bridging cultural periods
- Example of practice: Capital of Culture on the curriculum
- Example of practice: Classroom Fieldwork
- Example of practice: Classroom activity with Prezi
- Example of practice: Collective supervision
- Example of practice: Conceptual speed dating
- Example of practice: Discussion practice
- Example of practice: Domino learning game
- Example of practice: Exercise in oral presentation
- Example of practice: Extracurricular student presentations
- Example of practice: Facilitating study groups
- Example of practice: FAQs for student teachers
- Example of practice: Feedback on web communication
- Example of practice: Feedback on written exercises
- Example of practice: Field work in rural districts
- Example of practice: Form for assessment and feedback
- Example of practice: Good advice from former student teachers
- Example of practice: Group feedback on individual papers
- Example of practice: Group supervision
- Example of practice: Guidelines for beginning your master's thesis
- Example of practice: Ideas for master's thesis
- Example of practice: Image Documentation and Frottage
- Example of practice: Interdisciplinarity in teaching
- Example of practice: Interpretation with hermenutic shock
- Example of practice: Language issues
- Example of practice: Learning diary
- Example of practice: Learning with blogging
- Example of practice: Lightning round evaluation
- Example of practice: Logbook course
- Example of practice: Looped feedback on student products
- Example of practice: Master's thesis idea bank
- Example of practice: Matching thesis writers with supervisors
- Example of practice: Material exercise
- Example of practice: Memory exercise
- Example of practice: Mentor instruction
- Example of practice: Multicultural group work
- Example of practice: Museum visit and learning strategies
- Example of practice: Neighbour discussion
- Example of practice: Online intercultural exchange
- Example of practice: Online portfolio exam
- Example of practice: Oral feedback on audio file
- Example of practice: Oxford debate
- Example of practice: Participatory academic communities
- Example of practice: Participation in Aarhus Food Festival
- Example of practice: Peer feedback with the Text Feedback Game
- Example of practice: Peer-to-peer feedback with Google Docs
- Example of practice: Permanent cross-disciplinary working groups
- Example of practice: Portfolio of tasks for Research Skills and Academic Methods
- Example of practice: Poster session
- Example of practice: Presence on the learning platform
- Example of practice: Presentation with response
- Example of practice: Project management of exams
- Example of practice: Questioning texts I
- Example of practice: Questioning texts II
- Example of practice: Reading and writing workshop for first-year students
- Example of practice: Relevant digressions
- Example of practice: Repetition sheet
- Example of practice: Research workshop with students
- Example of practice: Round table
- Example of practice: Search exercise
- Example of practice: Semester reflections
- Example of practice: Scheduled group assignments
- Example of practice: Situated Learning: Focus on Process Work in Teaching
- Example of practice: Student seminars
- Example of practice: Students as guest lecturers
- Example of practice: Students collaborating with Aarhus 2017
- Example of practice: Students collect research data
- Example of practice: Students contribute to web portal
- Example of practice: Student teachers in language courses
- Example of practice: Study group and feedback guidelines
- Example of practice: Supervision on combination exams
- Example of practice: Supervision on supervision
- Example of practice: Supervision seminar for lecturers
- Example of practice: Submission with audio or video file
- Example of practice: The art of asking questions
- Example of practice: Treasure hunt
- Example of practice: Warm-up and cool-down exercises
- Example of practice: Written exercise with peer assessment
- Example of practice: Working with student teachers
- Example of practice: Workshop with student teachers
- Example of practice: Video journals
- Courses: Takeaway Teaching
- Courses: Thesis preparation (Takeaway Teaching)