Aarhus University Seal

Comparing AI-generated timelines with textbook content 

Short description

Students compare AI-generated timelines with textbook content, identifying unique and overlapping historical events and examining differing descriptions of the same events. This approach fosters active engagement, critical thinking, and digital literacy.

   

Motivation

Initially, I sought an effective way to present an overview of each historical period at the beginning of class. Then I noted that Padlet can create timelines using generative AI. After implementing this approach in class, I found it engaged students in learning historical periods while encouraging critical thinking about historiography and the use of generative AI. 

After presenting and discussing this case at a conference, I realized that in this approach, AI is not seen as an assistant to generate a draft for the teacher to revise, but rather as a tool that offers one possible interpretation of the topic under discussion.

Learning objectives

  1. To understand the studied historical period in depth. 
  2. To analyze diverse perspectives and interpretations of historical events. 
  3. To evaluate the capabilities and limitations of generative AI. 

Execution

THE PROCESS

Before Class

  1. Students read the textbook to learn about a given historical period. 
  2. The teacher uses Padlet (or other generative AI tools) to create a timeline for that historical period. If using Padlet, the timeline automatically includes key events, brief descriptions, and pictures representing these events. 

In Class

  1. The teacher presents the AI-generated timeline. 
  2. Students participate in think-pair-share activities in small groups to identify events mentioned uniquely by either the AI or the textbook. For events mentioned by both, they examine the similarities and differences in the descriptions. 
  3. The teacher leads a plenary discussion on the historical period, historiography, and the use of generative AI

RESSOURCES FOR STUDENTS

SUPPORT FOR STUDENTS

Textbook

Link to the AI-generated timeline 

Instructions 

Reflections

Outcomes

  • Compared to the traditional method where a group of students present on a historical period, this approach makes learning more interactive and engaging for all students. By comparing AI-generated timelines with textbook content, students are encouraged to reflect on diverse perspectives and interpretations of historical events.  

  • They also gain insights into how AI works, recognizing that AI-generated content may prioritize international events over domestic ones, present uncritical narratives to avoid controversy, and more. This enhances their digital literacy and makes them aware of the limitations of generative AI. 

   

Challenges

  • It is unclear which third-party AI service Padlet uses to generate the content.

   

Advices for other educators

  • This approach can be implemented using various generative AI tools, not just Padlet, and can be applied to a wide range of topics beyond timelines. 

  • Include detailed information such as the students’ major, academic level, and the lesson’s focus in prompts so the generated content is better tailored to the students.  

  • It is important to clearly indicate that the content is generated by AI and may contain errors or biases to prevent students from assuming it is entirely accurate.  

  • If using Padlet, it can be helpful to let students post their comments on AI-generated content for potential corrections and reflections. 


Basic information

Educator Yue Guan 
Faculty and department Faculty of Arts, School of Culture and Society, Department of Global Studies
Degree programme China Studies 
Level of study BA 2nd semester 
Course/subject Perspectives on the History of China
Number of students 10-20
Extent Activity
Teaching format Small Class Teaching
Implementation Spring 2024


Contact

Please contact the editors at AU Educate if you have any questions about the content of the platform or if you need consultation on your teaching from one of the many skilled professionals at the Centre for Educational Development