Aarhus University Seal

Iterative writing process with feedback from teacher and fellow students

Short description

Students receive open written feedback on assignments from both their teacher and fellow students. Feedback is given openly using the commenting function in the text editor. This is done over the course of four assignments in which students analyse digital media based on relevant theory reviewed during webinars. The activity described here is thus repeated four times.

Motivation

  • We wanted to focus on the students’ process while working through assignments and to give direct academic input on the students’ ongoing work. We also wanted to gain greater insight into the students’ work and learning processes. 

Learning outcomes

The main goal of this activity is to provide students with input and comments throughout the process of working on an academic assignment. Students also gain insight into and can become inspired by each other’s work while helping one another in their studies.

Execution

THE PROCESS

In plenum

Introduction to the activity 

  • During a webinar, students are given the assignment topic and can ask questions (perhaps based on previous feedback). 

  • Open feedback means that all students can see each other’s assignments and comments from teachers and fellow students. This is a key part of the activity, because it means that students can learn from each other. 

Individual

First assignment 

  • Students work on a draft of the assignment. The draft is submitted to a shared folder on OneDrive, where both teachers and fellow students can access it. 

First round of feedback 

  • Teachers give feedback by commenting directly in the document. Both the student receiving feedback and fellow students can reply to the comments. Fellow students are encouraged to participate in the dialogue, provide their own feedback and ask questions. 

In plenum

Reviewing feedback 

  • During a webinar, common themes mentioned in the feedback are discussed. Students can also ask the teacher general questions about feedback and discuss any doubts or queries with their teacher and fellow students. 

Individual

Second assignment 

  • Students can, but are not required to, make edits to their assignment based on the feedback received by their teachers and fellow students. The final assignment is then submitted.  

Second round of feedback 

  • Teachers also give feedback on the final assignment, and students can again provide feedback on each other’s work. 

Reflections

Outcomes

We found that students were receptive to the feedback they received from the teacher and improved their analytical and academic work throughout the module. The activity also gave us (as teachers) a valuable insight into how the students were doing, what their strengths were and where they could improve.

We also found that students liked being able to read each other’s drafts and assignments, feedback on their own assignments, and feedback on their fellow students’ assignments. The process often developed into a written dialogue in the text’s comments field.

Challenges

Students may feel uncomfortable having to share their assignments with their classmates. It is important to emphasise that the purpose of the activity is to establish a class culture of sharing, helping and inspiring each other. We emphasised that the assignments were a work in progress that could be improved up until the final exam.


Basic information

Educator

Francesco Caviglia

Christian Dalsgaard

Faculty and department ARTS, DPU
Degree programme ICT-based educational design
Level of study Master’s
Course/subject Digital Media
Number of students 25
Teaching format Classroom instruction
Implementation Autumn 2022

Contact

Please contact the editors at AU Educate if you have any questions about the content of the platform or if you need consultation on your teaching from one of the many skilled professionals at the Centre for Educational Development