Aarhus University Seal

Online peer feedback facilitated by student instructors

Short description

 Student instructors facilitated online peer feedback based on rubric criteria and provided feedback on the students’ assignments. 

Motivation

Teach the students about the value of feedback and how to give and receive constructive feedback.

  

Podcast in Danish: Online peer feedback facilitated by student instructors

Learning objectives

  • Improve the quality of the feedback that students give each other.  

  • Improve the students’ argumentation skills. 

Execution

THE PROCESS

Before class

Student instructors were tasked with facilitating online feedback in Peergrade (NB: FeedbackFruits is now used instead). They were given rubric criteria by the teachers but completed all other aspects of the exercise themselves. The exercise consisted of an introduction and three “feedback loops”.

Introduction

The students were introduced to the written assignment, the rubrics and how to hand in assignments in Peergrade (NB: FeedbackFruits is now used instead).  

1. and 2. feedback loop 

After handing in the written assignment, the students gave each other feedback in Peergrade (NB: FeedbackFruits​​​​​​​ is now used instead) by using the relevant rubrics. The students modified their assignments based on the feedback they received, re-uploaded them in Peergrade and repeated the feedback loop.  

3. feedback loop

The student instructors gave feedback on the final assignments.

RESSOURCES FOR STUDENTS

SUPPORT FOR STUDENTS

Rubrics

Reflections

Challenges

  • In Peergrade (NB: FeedbackFruits is now used instead), it is possible to see who has written which assignment, which can give rise to challenges if the assignments are very personal (ed. In FeedbackFruits, assignments can be anonymised and students can only see the assignment they need to give feedback on).     

     

Advices for other educators 

  • Student instructors and teachers should agree on the framework, expectations and responsibilities in advance, and they should continue to cooperate throughout the course.  

  • Do not underestimate the amount of time needed for this exercise. Facilitating an online feedback activity is time-consuming. The final feedback loop is particularly time-consuming, because the previous loops and rounds of re-writing have improved the quality of the assignments, so more detailed feedback is required. Student instructors should make sure they allocate enough time for this.   

  • The purpose of the exercise and the benefits of peer feedback should be made clear from the beginning, to motivate student participation.   


Basic information

Educator Conducted by student instructors 
Faculty and department Aarhus BSS, Department of Management 
Degree programme Department of Management 
 Level of study Master’s
Course/subject Teambuilding and teamwork on the ITKO programme 
Number of students 94
Extent Series of sessions  
Teaching format  Instruktorundervisning

Contact

Please contact the editors at AU Educate if you have any questions about the content of the platform or if you need consultation on your teaching from one of the many skilled professionals at the Centre for Educational Development