Aarhus University Seal

Things as objects of communication

Short description

The course

Anthropological Knowledge Dissemination aims at providing the students with both theoretical and practical knowledge of how to disseminate anthropological questions through different media and to different audiences. Students are split into four media groups where they will delve into different ways of disseminating through audio, images, text and objects. This activity is related to the latter media group - objects.

The course emphasises the importance of group work as the students are challenged to create an exhibition for a museum during the duration of the course.

The activity

This activity attempts to teach students how meanings can be derived from closely engaging with objects. Working with in-depth object analysis, the students will be discovering the many different ways in which objects can make meaning by themselves and in relation to other objects and their surroundings. This activity is oriented towards students working with museums, anthropology, archaeology and heritage, or other places where objects can play a central role for analyses and discussion.

Teacher's motivation

This activity was created as a way of inviting students to think about things; to make objects a part of their analytical work and making materiality visible to the students outside the course as well. The activity encourages the students to ‘make mistakes’ – to find the models difficult or unable to provide the framework for their understanding of their objects. In this way, the students learn to critically engage with the models and create new ideas for how they will use objects in their own projects.

Description of the activity

The teaching

  • As preparation for the lesson, the students are asked to bring an object with them for class.
  • In the beginning of the lesson they present them shortly to each other – what they are, why they brought them.
  • Then the students pair up in groups of two and are given an A and B form which they work on in 15 minutes. The students fill out the forms – one working on A, the other on B – in pairs and help each other. The idea is for the students to compare the models and work out their shortcomings and what really works for them.
    • The A form is based on Pearce’s Model for Artefact Studies from a short text they have read for the lesson and which was presented in class.
    • The B form is based on the Moesgaard Museum Ethnographic Collections’ documentation practice, which they were also presented with in the beginning of the lesson and invited to check out online on their own beforehand.
  • During the activity the teacher will walk around between the students to answer any potential questions.
  • After 15 minutes the students share their findings with another pair for 10 minutes before sharing with the rest of the group in plenum.
  • The teacher leads the discussion in plenum. The students present their thoughts and reflections on the models, but also what they have learned from their objects. Questions could be:
    • What were they most surprised to find out? What was difficult to know? How does the two models compare? If they had to create a model for object analysis, what would they include and what would they exclude?

Outcome of the activity

In the Anthropological Knowledge Dissemination course, this activity has gotten the most praise from students in evaluations. This is because it forces them to use what they have read for other lessons to actively engage with their own objects in a way that prepares them not only for the exam, but also for the more immediate challenge of creating a museum exhibition in 4-5 weeks.

This activity provides those students who have not worked analytically with objects before with a new language for discussing and thinking about things. This language is especially relevant for students working with museums, but also as a way of easing students into theories of materiality that can be useful in other parts of their studies.

Worth considering

  • This activity is a part of a larger course focusing on creating museum exhibitions and thus this aspect plays a central role in the discussions between students. Because of the time constraints for the course, the students are very engaged as they need this knowledge, not just to pass an exam, but to create a project. 
  • It might motivate students when they have to create a project for others to see.
  • It might be possible to think the activity into courses with a port folio exam where the reflections from the activity can be used to write a short paper on a specific object.

Basic information

  • Faculty: Arts
  • Degree Programme: Anthropology
  • Course: Anthropological Knowledge Dissemination
  • Study level: Bachelor
  • Course size: 15-20
  • Teaching method: Small class teaching
  • Extent: Activity
  • Primary type of activity: Practice, Analysis
  • How the case was conduted: Campus teaching 

Learning objectives

The purpose is to teach the students to make objects a part of their analytical work and making materiality visible to the students outside the course as well.

Links and materials

Handouts:

Website: 

Readings for the activity:

  • Pearce, S. 1994 ”Thinking about things” in S. Pearce (ed.) Interpreting Objects and Collections. London and New York: Routledge.